Files and plans
Project record
DocumentStatus
Contract, JCT SBC 2016, signedCurrent
Drawing A-102 rev C, gable elevationCurrent
Drawing A-102 rev BSuperseded
Site photographs, week 1418 files
A superseded drawing is the most expensive piece of paper on a site. Photographs taken on a phone and never filed are worth nothing when a defect is disputed two years later.
A superseded drawing is the most expensive piece of paper on a site. Photographs taken on a phone and never filed are worth nothing when a defect is disputed.
QScope keeps plans, site photographs, contracts and correspondence against the project they belong to, so the file is assembled as you go rather than the week before an adjudication.
Nobody sets out to reconstruct a project file the week before an adjudication. It happens because the record was never kept in one place while the job was running.
Filing against the project as you work costs seconds. Reconstructing it afterwards costs days, and the parts you cannot find are the parts that mattered.
A drawing is only evidence if you can show which version was current on the day the work was done. The file answers what. The audit trail answers when, and by whom.
Every upload, supersession and deletion is recorded automatically against the surveyor or guest who made it, and nothing in the interface can amend the entry.
A drawing revision usually starts as a question. The RFI records when it was asked and when it was answered, which is what turns a delay into an entitlement, or fails to.
Kept beside the drawings and photographs, the RFI and the revision it produced sit on the same project rather than in two systems that lose sight of each other.
A revised drawing that changes the cost of the works needs an instruction behind it. Without one the change was done, and it will not reach the final account because nothing connects it to a valuation.
The instruction register sits with the drawings, so the authority and the document it changed are filed against the same project.
No, and it does not pretend to be. QScope is built for the commercial side of the job. The programme, drawings, photographs, tasks and RFIs are here so the record sits with the money, not so you stop using a dedicated site tool if you have one.
Yes, if you give them comment level access. Their uploads are recorded against them in the audit trail.
You can export everything at any time, including after a trial ends, and your data stays available for export for 60 days after cancellation.
Not automatically. The Gantt is a commercial view of whether the job runs past the contract date. Percentages certified are your professional assessment of the work done, and QScope does not guess them from a bar chart.
Not your whole portfolio. One live job, one certificate. If it does not save you time the first time you use it, walk away and take your data with you.