UK

Counting the days, the way the Act counts them

Every payment deadline on a UK job is a day count, and the Construction Act counts days its own way. QScope does the arithmetic so the timeline is enforceable, not approximate.

QScope Team · 27 January 2026 · 6 min read

The Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 runs on dates, and getting the dates wrong is how good positions are lost. The timeline is not complicated, but it is exact, and a count done in your head over a holiday period is usually wrong. QScope does the counting so the deadlines it flags are the ones a court or an adjudicator would recognise.

The timeline QScope builds

PointRule
Due dateAs the contract sets it
Payment noticeWithin five days of the due date (s.110A)
Final date for paymentAs the contract sets it, Scheme default seventeen days after the due date
Pay less noticeNot later than the prescribed period before the final date, Scheme default seven days

QScope takes the due date from the valuation and lays the rest of the timeline out from it, using whichever periods the contract actually specifies and falling back to the Scheme for Construction Contracts only where the contract is silent.

Section 116, the part people get wrong

Section 116 counts in calendar days but excludes Christmas Day, Good Friday and bank holidays. A seven day period that crosses the late December holidays does not end seven calendar days later. QScope strips out the statutory non-days when it counts, so a deadline near a holiday period lands on the date the Act produces, not the date a wall calendar suggests.

The Act does not count days the way a calendar does. A deadline you worked out by counting squares is a deadline you might have got wrong by three days.

Why the timeline feeds everything else

The same timeline drives three things: the notice engine that flags the payment notice and pay less notice deadlines, the cash flow forecast that places the receipt at the final date, and any adjudication reference that turns on whether a notice was in time. Because all three read one calculated timeline, they cannot disagree with each other.

When it goes to adjudication

Adjudication under the Act is fast and turns on dates as much as on merits. A smash and grab succeeds because a notice was late, not because the valuation was wrong. QScope holds the dated timeline and the notices served against it, so if a dispute is referred, the record of what was due when, and what was served when, is already assembled rather than reconstructed under a twenty eight day timetable.

The record is the case. In an adjudication about payment, the decisive evidence is usually a set of dates: due date, notice date, final date. A timeline calculated correctly and kept from the start is worth more than any argument built afterwards.

QScope makes the timeline the reliable thing on the job, so the dates are never what beats you.

QScope does this part for you

QScope builds the payment timeline from the due date under the Construction Act, counting days per section 116 so the notice deadlines and any adjudication reference rest on the enforceable dates.

Start free trial

Keep reading

Related

Try it on your next valuation

Not your whole portfolio. One live job, one certificate. If it does not save you time the first time you use it, walk away and take your data with you.